CIFS Australia

Cult Information and Family Support Inc.

About CIFS

Can I Help


In The News

Books + Video




Info Search




Quote of the Day:
'Victims gradually lose their ability to make independent decisions and exercise informed consent.'
- Dr Margaret Singer



| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010- | World |
Cleric says hate law abused
Herald Sun
John Masanauskas
September 26, 2008

VICTORIA'S religious hatred law is open to manipulation by groups who want to stifle criticism of their faith, a Uniting Church minister says.

Cult expert the Rev David Millikan said the original intention of the law was being undermined.

"If the purpose of the law is to protect religion from excessive and pernicious comments, then fair enough," he told the Herald Sun.

"But if it means that journalists and experts have got to be careful when they're doing nothing more than reporting matters of fact, then the law is allowed to become an ass."

The Rev Millikan said the Exclusive Brethren, a Christian cult, was threatening him with the state's religious vilification laws over comments he had made about the group.

The Sydney-based minister often gives interviews and legal evidence about cults.

The Rev Millikan said he was worried that the law was being used in a bid to shut down factually based criticism of religion.

"We have available to us instruments elsewhere within the law to protect the rights of religion, and that (religious vilification) law is not really doing its job," he said.

"The law is open to manipulation."

In a high-profile case, two Victorian Christian pastors were found to have vilified Muslims in 2002 during a seminar and in some publications.

Danny Naliah and Daniel Scot, from Catch the Fire Ministries, eventually had the ruling overturned by the Court of Appeal.

Last year 29 inquiries and four complaints relating to alleged religious vilification were received by the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission.

Commission CEO Helen Szoke said the Rev Millikan appeared to misunderstand the purpose of racial and religious hatred laws.

"If a journalist or an academic or a commentator is discussing a race or religious matter, and they're doing that in the course of their work and in good faith . . . then that doesn't constitute vilification," Dr Szoke said.

"The concept of vilification is about inciting hatred and really promoting and provoking serious contempt and revulsion of other people because of their race or religion."

Disclaimer:This news page is about groups, organizations or movements, which may have been called "cults" and/or "cult-like" in some way, shape or form. But not all groups called either "cults" or "cult-like" are harmful. Instead, they may be benign and generally defined as simply people intensely devoted to a person, place or thing. Therefore, the discussion or mention of a group, organization or person on this page, is not necessarily meant pejoratively. Readers are encouraged to read widely on a topic before forming an opinion. Never accept information from a single source at face value. This website only holds a small amount of information and should not be relied on as a complete source. For example, if you find older information, this should be weighed up against newer information as circumstances can change.
S i t e   S e a r c h :

1 0 0 0 +   p a g e s



ABC Radio:
16 Oct 2010
14 Oct 2010


CIFS Conference:
Brisbane 2012 *
Canberra 2011
Seminar 2011
Brisbane 2010


Visions of Paradise


Cults: After-Effects




Top of Page
| Home | About CIFS | Can I Help | Contact | In The News | Books + Video | Stories | Articles | Events | Info Search | Links |